🔗 Share this article

Based on a new analysis, numerous of personnel with experience in the energy industry have been appointed within the existing leadership, comprising over 40 who formerly worked personally for oil companies.

Context of the Study

This report analyzed the profiles of candidates and appointees positioned in the White House and eight national offices handling energy regulation. These encompass major bodies such as the environmental agency, the interior agency, and the energy office.

Larger Policy Context

This report surfaces amid continuing efforts to dismantle environmental policies and clean energy programs. As an example, recent legislation have unlocked extensive regions of public land for extraction and eliminated support for sustainable power.

With the flood of negative actions that have happened on the environment arena... it’s important to inform the people that these aren’t just steps from the amorphous, massive thing that is the leadership writ large, said one researcher involved in the analysis. It is commonly individual actors with ties to certain wealthy interests that are implementing this disastrous pro-industry program.

Key Discoveries

Researchers identified 111 personnel whom they deemed as industry insiders and clean energy critics. That includes 43 officials who were personally working by oil enterprises. Among them are high-profile top executives including the energy secretary, who formerly served as chief executive of a oil extraction corporation.

This list also features lesser-known government staff. For example, the division handling clean technology is managed by a ex- oil executive. Similarly, a senior policy consultant in the White House has held high-ranking roles at prominent petroleum firms.

Other Links

Another 12 personnel were found to have links to industry-backed conservative research groups. Those cover ex- staff and researchers of organizations that have strongly opposed clean power and advocated the use of conventional sources.

A total of 29 other staff are previous corporate leaders from heavy industry sectors whose business interests are directly connected to oil and gas. Additional officials have associations with energy providers that market fossil fuels or public officials who have advocated pro-gas agendas.

Departmental Focus

Investigators discovered that 32 personnel at the interior agency alone have ties to fossil fuel industries, making it the highest influenced federal department. This features the secretary of the department, who has long received oil support and served as a bridge between fossil fuel industry supporters and the campaign.

Political Contributions

Fossil fuel supporters contributed substantial resources to the election initiative and swearing-in. After entering the White House, the administration has not only established pro-fossil fuel rules but also created tax breaks and exemptions that favor the field.

Expertise Questions

Besides industry-linked appointees, the researchers noted multiple White House officials who were nominated to key roles with minimal or no pertinent knowledge.

These officials may not be linked to fossil fuels so directly, but their lack of expertise is concerning, stated one analyst. It is logical to think they will be easily influenced, or susceptible individuals, for the oil industry’s plans.

As an example, the nominee to lead the Environmental Protection Agency’s division of chief legal officer has very little court history, having not once handled a lawsuit to resolution, nor participated in a sworn statement, and not filed a court petition.

During another example, a White House aide working on regulatory issues arrived to the role after serving in positions disconnected to energy, with no clear specific energy industry or policy expertise.

White House Reaction

A representative for the executive branch criticized the analysis, commenting that the leadership’s personnel are exceptionally competent to implement on the public’s mandate to increase national fuel development.

Previous and Current Context

The administration implemented a significant number of deregulatory steps during its first period. In its present term, prepared with conservative agendas, it has overseen a far broader and stricter crackdown on ecological policies and renewable energy.

There is no embarrassment, commented a analyst. Officials are eager and prepared to go out there and tout the fact that they are performing benefits for the fossil fuel industry, resource industry, the energy business.