🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

The Baltic nation's parliament members have decided to withdraw from an international accord created to protect females from violence, covering domestic abuse, following prolonged and intense debates in the parliament.

Thousands of protesters assembled in the capital this week to voice disagreement with the decision. The ultimate decision now lies with President Edgars Rinkevics, who must decide whether to endorse or reject the proposed law.

Known as the Istanbul Convention, the international accord only took effect in the Baltic state last twelve months ago, mandating authorities to develop laws and support services to end all types of violence.

Latvia has become the initial EU country to initiate the procedure of exiting from the convention. Turkey pulled out in two years ago, a decision that human rights organizations characterized as a major regression for gender equality.

Political Controversy and Opposition

The treaty was approved by the European Union in last year, yet conservative groups have contended that its focus on gender equality undermines family values and advances what they term "non-traditional gender concepts".

Following a thirteen-hour debate in the Latvian parliament, MPs decided by a margin of 56-32 to exit from the treaty, a action sponsored by political opponents but backed by representatives from one of the three governing partners.

The result represents a defeat for moderate conservative government leader the nation's PM, who joined demonstrators outside parliament earlier this week. "We refuse to give up, we will persist in our struggle so that violence will not prevail," she declared to the crowd.

Ideological Divisions and Reactions

One of the primary political groups advocating for the exit is a nationalist party, whose head has urged the public to choose between what he terms a "traditional family unit" and "gender ideology with various gender identities".

The nation's human rights commissioner Karina Palkova urged the treaty not to be made political, while the group the rights organization stated it was "not a danger to Latvian values, it served as a tool to achieve them".

The recent vote has provoked broad protest both within Latvia and abroad.

Twenty-two thousand people have signed a national appeal calling for the convention to be maintained. The women's rights organization Centrs Marta has announced a protest for the coming week, accusing lawmakers of disregarding the will of the nation's citizens.

Global Concerns and Potential Future Actions

The head of the European organization's parliamentary assembly commented that the Baltic state had made a rash choice fueled by misinformation. He characterized it as an "never-before-seen and deeply concerning step backward for female equality and human rights in Europe".

He noted that since the transcontinental nation abandoned the treaty in 2021, instances of femicide and violence against women had risen sharply.

Because the vote did not secure a two-thirds support, the head of state could possibly send back the bill for additional consideration if he has concerns.

President the national leader stated on digital platforms that he would evaluate the decision according to legal requirements, "considering governmental and judicial considerations, rather than belief-based perspectives".

Last week, another member of the governing alliance, the reformist party, suggested it would not rule out appealing to the Constitutional Court.

"This decision represents a worrisome development for gender equality not only in our nation but throughout Europe," stated a rights activist.

• Domestic abuse statistics have been increasing in multiple European countries
• The European treaty mandates specific safeguards for victims of gender-based violence
• The nation's vote could influence similar debates in other EU countries