🔗 Share this article

January 30th, 1972 stands as arguably the deadliest – and momentous – days in three decades of conflict in this area.

Within the community of the incident – the legacy of Bloody Sunday are displayed on the buildings and embedded in public consciousness.

A protest demonstration was organized on a chilly yet clear period in Derry.

The march was opposing the system of internment – holding suspects without due process – which had been implemented following an extended period of conflict.

Military personnel from the elite army unit shot dead 13 people in the Bogside area – which was, and remains, a overwhelmingly republican population.

A particular photograph became notably memorable.

Pictures showed a clergyman, Fr Edward Daly, displaying a stained with blood fabric while attempting to shield a crowd transporting a young man, the fatally wounded individual, who had been killed.

Journalists recorded much footage on the day.

The archive features the priest informing a media representative that troops "gave the impression they would shoot indiscriminately" and he was "absolutely certain" that there was no justification for the gunfire.

The narrative of the incident wasn't accepted by the original examination.

The first investigation concluded the soldiers had been fired upon initially.

Throughout the negotiation period, the ruling party commissioned a new investigation, after campaigning by family members, who said Widgery had been a whitewash.

That year, the findings by the investigation said that generally, the paratroopers had discharged weapons initially and that none of the casualties had been armed.

The then government leader, the Prime Minister, apologised in the House of Commons – stating deaths were "without justification and inexcusable."

The police commenced investigate the incident.

An ex-soldier, referred to as Soldier F, was prosecuted for killing.

Accusations were made regarding the fatalities of one victim, 22, and twenty-six-year-old another victim.

Soldier F was also accused of seeking to harm several people, other civilians, Joe Mahon, Michael Quinn, and an unknown person.

Exists a court ruling preserving the veteran's identity protection, which his legal team have maintained is essential because he is at risk of attack.

He testified the investigation that he had solely shot at individuals who were carrying weapons.

This assertion was disputed in the official findings.

Material from the examination was unable to be used immediately as testimony in the court case.

During the trial, the veteran was screened from view behind a protective barrier.

He made statements for the first time in the proceedings at a hearing in late 2024, to reply "not guilty" when the accusations were read.

Relatives of the deceased on the incident journeyed from Londonderry to the judicial building daily of the proceedings.

One relative, whose brother Michael was fatally wounded, said they understood that hearing the proceedings would be emotional.

"I visualize the events in my mind's eye," John said, as we visited the main locations referenced in the trial – from the location, where the victim was shot dead, to the adjoining the courtyard, where James Wray and another victim were fatally wounded.

"It even takes me back to where I was that day.

"I helped to carry my brother and put him in the vehicle.

"I experienced again each detail during the proceedings.

"Despite enduring the process – it's still valuable for me."